USDOL Issues Guidance On Employers' Obligation to Provide Breaks to Nursing Mothers

Posted on July 20, 2010 by Noel Tripp

As previously reported here, the recent Health Care Reform legislation includes a provision, which became effective immediately upon passage of the Act, requiring employers to provide breaks for employees to express milk for nursing children.  The USDOL issued a fact sheet this week explaining its view of an employer’s obligations under this enactment.  The highlights are below and the full government Fact Sheet can be viewed here.

·         The requirement only applies to non-exempt employees however the DOL notes that state laws with similar requirements may cover all employees;

·         The break time need not be paid as long as the individual is completely relieved of work duties and the activity does not occur during an otherwise paid break period;

·         Reasonable break time must be provided for up to 1 year following birth.  There are no set rules regarding frequency or length and each situation stands alone;

·         An employer is required to provide a location shielded from view and a private bathroom will not suffice.  The space need not be dedicated but must be made available immediately when needed; and

·         Employers with under 50 employees can assert an undue hardship defense, however, there is no guidance as to whether this is determined on a location by location or employer-wide basis.  Forthcoming regulations from the USDOL will hopefully clarify this issue.

All employers must ensure compliance with this new legal mandate.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Health Care Reform Act Expands Scope of FLSA Retaliation Claims

Posted on April 15, 2010 by Noel Tripp

Jackson Lewis previously advised clients and friends of the Health Care Reform Act’s provision requiring employers to provide employees breaks for breastfeeding: http://www.jacksonlewis.com/legalupdates/article.cfm?aid=2016. (Regulations interpreting such requirements are expected to be issued within the next 6 months.)  Also contained in the over two thousand-page enactment is Section 1558, which adds a new Section 18C to the FLSA.  This new FLSA provision prohibits employers from discriminating or retaliating against any employee who has:

(1) received a credit under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or a subsidy under section 1402 of this Act; (2) provided, caused to be provided, or is about to provide or cause to be provided to the employer, the Federal Government, or the attorney general of a State information relating to any violation of, or any act or omission the employee reasonably believes to be a violation of, any provision of this title (or an amendment made by this title); (3) testified or is about to testify in a proceeding concerning such violation; (4) assisted or participated, or is about to assist or participate, in such a proceeding; or (5) objected to, or refused to participate in, any activity, policy, practice, or assigned task that the employee (or other such person) reasonably believed to be in violation of any provision of this title (or amendment), or any order, rule, regulation, standard, or ban under this title (or amendment).

Aggrieved current or former employees who assert claims under this provision are entitled to a jury trial.

Employers can expect this cause of action for retaliation to be another tool in the arsenal of Plaintiffs’ lawyers.

 

Tags: , , ,