New York Employers Must Issue First Annual Wage Theft Prevention Act Notice In January 2012

New York’s landmark Wage Theft Prevention Act, which was recently modified and adopted in California, requires employers to issue to all New York employees an annual notice complying with the requirements of New York Labor Law § 195 (as amended by the Act). While the statute was effective in April 2011, the annual notice requirement, which is in addition to the statute’s mandatory new hire notice and other requirements, is applicable for the first time in 2012. The notice must be provided prior to February 1, 2012, and the notice obligations are summarized here. Notice can be provided electronically as long as certain requirements are met.

While there is no mandatory form of notice, the New York State Department of Labor has provided sample forms. In addition to English, the NYSDOL has provided these forms in other languages, consistent with the requirement that the notice be provided in English and also in the employee’s “primary language.” 

Large employers, and employers with a large virtual or remote segment in their workforce, are already wrestling with how to assemble a compliant notice program under the Act.  The absence of clear guidance regarding certain provisions and requirements makes compliance more difficult. However, compliance is paramount, as failure to provide the annual notice constitutes a violation of Section 198(1-b), which, under the Wage Theft Act, can carry with it a penalty of “fifty dollars for each work week that the violations occurred or continue to occur”, among other potential remedies. 

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to assist employers with compliance efforts, including New York Labor Law compliance experts Richard Greenberg and Craig Roberts.

 

New York Enacts State-Wide "Wage Theft" Act

On December 13, New York Governor David Paterson signed into law the “Wage Theft Prevention Act,” a bill which provides new and expanded protections for workers under the New York State Labor Law. 

Among other provisions, the new law (which takes effect in 120 days) includes the following provisions:

·         An increase in the liquidated damages penalty for violations of Labor Law Article 6 from 25% to 100% -- the amount available under the FLSA:

·         Any employee not provided with the new hire “rate of pay” notice required by N.Y. Labor Law § 195 may bring a cause of action to recover $50 for each workweek that such a violation occurs, as well as attorneys fees;

·         The notice previously required by Labor Law § 195 must now be provided to each employee in English and the language “identified by each employee as the primary language of such employee;” and

·         Expanded wage statements which include, among other new requirements, the employee’s basis of pay, whether hourly, piece rate, salary or other basis, and, for non-exempt employees, the applicable overtime rate. Under the new law, any change to an employee’s regular rate must be reflected in the wage statement, or in a revised Labor Law § 195 notice. 

We will provide further details regarding the obligations posed by this new law in the near future on www.JacksonLewis.com.

NYSDOL Update: New Hire Notification and Permissible Wage Deductions

Employers with New York State operations must ensure they understand the New York State Department of Labor's current position as to new hire notices and wage deductions.

New Hire Notices

As previously reported here, since October 26, 2009, New York state employers have been obligated to notify all new hires in writing of their hourly rate, overtime rate (if applicable) and payday, and receive a written acknowledgment of such notification.  The Department has issued model forms for various types of pay structures, all of which can be found on the Department's website, but continues to advise employers that use of the model forms is not mandatory.   One of the Department's model forms is directed to new hires the employer intends to treat as exempt employees, and both the form and its accompanying instructions require employers to list the exemption applicable to such employees.  However, this form and its accompanying instructions were not fully consistent with the general guidelines for compliance, also posted by the Department on its website.  Such guidelines simply stated that the exemption “should” be listed; it did not make doing so mandatory.  

Recently, the Department modified its general guidelines and now consistently advises that the exemption must be listed for exempt employees on the new hire notice.  In order to comply with the Department’s position, employers must ensure they carefully analyze the appropriate exemption(s) prior to listing them on any notice to ensure such statement is accurate.   It is important to note however that this new directive goes beyond the statutory requirement contained in Section 195 of the Labor Law, although the statute does provide the Department with the right to issue "requirements as to content and form."  

Wage Deductions

In addition to permitting deductions "in accordance with the provisions of any law or any rule or regulation issued by any governmental agency", Section 193 of the Labor Law permits deductions "for the benefit of employee" as long as such deductions are authorized in writing.   Over the years, the Department, through opinion letters, has advised that this language permits deductions for various issues (such as wage overpayments and repayment of loans) as long as the employer obtained written consent and limited such deduction to 10% of gross wages for the payroll period. 

However, since 2006, based on New York State Court of Appeals’ decision in Angello v. Labor Ready, the Department has consistently narrowed its interpretation of the phrase “for the benefit of the employee.”   For example, in a 2007 opinion letter, the Department stated that in order for a deduction “for the benefit of the employee” to be permissible it must be  a deduction which benefits the employee which is also similar to those enumerated in the statute (i.e., insurance premiums, pension or health and welfare benefits, contributions to charitable organizations, payments for United States bonds, payments for dues or assessments to a labor organization). Thereafter, through opinion letters, the Department modified its prior position as to the legality of certain wage deductions, such as a deduction from a final paycheck to cover used but unaccrued paid time off, and deductions for loan repayments and wage overpayments. The Department now states that such deductions are impermissible regardless of the employee's written consent.  Based on the Department's consistently evolving, highly-protectionist pro-employee position, employers should carefully review their wage deduction practices in New York State.

Every business with New York operations should review these wage and hour compliance issues with counsel to ensure compliance.