On May 28, 2013, New York’s highest state court, the New York Court of Appeals, will hear oral argument regarding the scope and application of New York Labor Law 196-d and its tip splitting provisions to Starbucks’ tip pooling practices. The court’s analysis of these issues, which came to the court as certified questions from
assistant store manager
New York Federal Court Finds Questions of Fact Exist as to Whether “Assistant” or “Co” Managers at Drug Chain Are Properly Classified as Exempt Employees
By Noel P. Tripp on
Posted in Exemptions
The most recent installment in the continuing saga concerning the exempt status of various managerial titles in the retail industry involves a group of plaintiffs referred to by their employer (the drug chain Rite Aid) as “Co-Managers” and by plaintiffs as “Assistant Managers.” Judge Paul Gardephe of the United States District Court for the Southern…
Jackson Lewis Team Defeats Conditional Certification In Store Manager Litigation
By Noel P. Tripp on
Posted in Class Actions
Recently, we discussed the standard applicable to collective action certification of FLSA claims at the so-called “second stage”, which occurs after factual discovery. This is a more stringent standard than that applied to cases at the initial “conditional certification” stage, where courts apply a standard that varies from circuit to circuit, but is typically lenient. However…